Diversity
is the face of Indonesia. Bhinneka
Tunggal Ika which means “Unity in Diversity” (literally; many, yet one) clearly shows that we are
living in the context of pluralism, and it is even the identity of the state.
As a part of Indonesian, Mollucas has also the same identity, for people live
in religious, social, language, and ethnic diversity. As an identity, it has
ever been problematic in the history of Mollucan people when they were
struggling to killed each other, especially those who were different with their
religious community. As we know, the riot was over and the community was
reconciled, but I am skeptical to say that the current situation will guarantee
the future, where people will live peacefully among them. I see that in the
grass root community the conflict potential still be preserved. In this
context, I am going to say that reconciliation should be striven continuously
by involving the whole community, including women.
In
the context of conflict, women played an important role for making peace and
harmony. They began in the public space, such as traditional market which was
opened in the borders between Moslem and Christian where they were actors in
the economic transaction. Such transaction was more than economic activity, but
a part of encountering the other to talked and to reconciled. So, conflict
resolution cannot be separated from women’s participation. The question now is;
is there any place for women in the
context where conflict is over? I absolutely agree with Anna Marsiana that
said that they are sent back to home with their domestic roles, even if they
have public role but it does not guarantee that they will be the decision
makers. The later symptom can also be found in the church. Almost 50 % of the
total ministers in GPM (Gereja Protestan Maluku) are women, but the leadership positions
are dominantly controlled by men. I think that giving the opportunity for the
women to be ‘the leaders’ is one of the holistic ways to bring peace. For me,
when women are the leaders, they will not only lead and make a decision with ‘their
brains’ but also with ‘their heart’ as their emotional characteristics. They
will act as mothers who care to every member of the family. They love to unity
them, and not to separate. So, I am emphasizing again and again that women
leadership, either in the social or religious community is very important, not
only to oppose the patriarchal system but also to the harmony in the context of
interreligious community.
I
also suggest that: (1) women empowerment has to become priority. Its focus is
socio-economic aspect. Their basic skills should be improved, getting better
education and occupation, and being ready in economical market competition. I
think that one of the conflict’s causal factors is joblessness. When people are
lacking of occupation, the crime will be very potential to occur. Conversely,
when they get opportunity to work, the crime or conflict then can be reduced. Here
I am not saying that ‘the jobless women’ are the causal factor of the conflict,
but what I am trying to stress is that by getting the opportunity to work or to
be empowered, they can also empower the other and creatively making the
opportunity to them for working. (2) The Mollucan women have to work together
to return the cultural values back to their places and at the same time trying
to strengthen ‘the motherhood principle’ in the socio-cultural system within
the community where women especially mothers are seen as the most important
figures in the family (ina-centred; ina
means mother).
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar